Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Anne Wojcicki’s nonprofit reaches deal to acquire 23andMe - TechCrunch

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

POLL: ESPN writer stokes the flames of Lions trading for All-Pro EDGE - Pride Of Detroit

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

New questions emerge from the new charges in Kilmar Abrego Garcia case - NBC News

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Thank you.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Ali Larter on ‘Landman’ Season 2 and Playing Out Her and Billy Bob Thornton’s “Unlikely Love Affair” - The Hollywood Reporter

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Graphene Is Stretchable? Physicists Make “Miracle Material” Bend Like Never Before - SciTechDaily

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Are democrats eating crow?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

What’s next?

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

How would you feel about your husband allowing a mutual friend to see you naked and exposed to show off your pussy?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

How do you choose sunscreen for oily skin?

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Eum ipsa id ullam qui.